INTERNATIONAL COAL NEWS

Miner sues for work injury

A WESTERN Pennsylvania miner has filed a civil lawsuit against Alpha Natural Resources and one of...

Donna Schmidt

According to state legal journal the Pennsylvania Record, Thomas Peters filed his complaint in December in state court and named Alpha as well as Amfire Mining as defendants.

In his complaint, the miner said he sustained facial fractures, including a broken jaw, at the Dora No. 8 deep mine in Hamilton, Jefferson County, on January 18, 2012, when the brakes on the Johnson mantrip he was operating failed, which led to the unit careening into a pole.

In addition to a fractured jaw and extensive facial lacerations, he also received a left-sided orbital fracture requiring surgery, a nasal fracture, eight rib fractures, a left elbow fracture requiring numerous surgical procedures and tendon tears, the complaint states.

According to Peters’ filing, the unit was travelling downhill to enter the mine when the malfunction occurred and resulted in a high-speed collision with a telephone pole.

He said the defendants were responsible for the vehicle’s maintenance and care and accused the parties of negligence for failing to properly inspect, repair and maintain the device.

He said Alpha and Amfire also failed to adequately warn him of the faulty mantrip or ensure that the brakes were in working order.

He argued that the producer allowed the mantrip to be maintained without a proper braking system.

The miner, according to the Record, claims he suffered “substantial facial and bodily disfigurement” and lost earnings due to his inability to work.

He said he also experienced great pain and suffering, embarrassment, inconvenience and mental anguish following the incident.

“Defendant Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. negligently failed to put in place any standardised operating and safety procedures for the Dore #8 deep mine and/or negligently failed to monitor defendant Amfire Mining Company compliance with standardised operating and safety policies and training for the … mine,” the complaint stated.

On January 6, Jackson Kelly Pittsburgh attorneys Michael Leahey and Daniel Michelmore, both representing the defendants, filed a removal notice with the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania seeking the jurisdiction of a federal judge for the litigation.

According to the Record, the pair feels the amount in controversy in the case will exceed $US75,000, supported by the miner’s pre-suit demand of $2.75 million.

The $75,000 figure would trigger federal court oversight, they said.

Peters is being represented by Rudberg Law Offices.

The federal case number is 2:14-cv-00021-DSC.

TOPICS:

Expert-led Insights reports built on robust data, rigorous analysis and expert commentary covering mining Exploration, Future Fleets, Automation and Digitalisation, and ESG.

Expert-led Insights reports built on robust data, rigorous analysis and expert commentary covering mining Exploration, Future Fleets, Automation and Digitalisation, and ESG.

editions

ESG Index 2025: Benchmarking the Future of Sustainable Mining

The ESG Index provides an in-depth evaluation of the ESG performance of 60+ of the world’s largest mining companies. It assesses companies across 10 weighted indicators within 6 essential ESG pillars.

editions

Automation and Digitalisation Insights 2025

Discover how mining companies and investors are adopting, deploying and evaluating new technologies.

editions

Mining IQ Exploration Insights 2025

Gain exclusive insights into the world of exploration in a comprehensive review of the top trending technologies, intercepts, discoveries and more.

editions

Future Fleets Insights 2025

Mining IQ Future Fleets Insights 2025 looks at how companies are using alternative energy sources to cut greenhouse gas emmissions