INTERNATIONAL COAL NEWS

Carbon tax clean up

TWO of Australia's leading clean-up scientists say part of the carbon tax to cleaning up the mess...

Staff Reporter

This article is 13 years old. Images might not display.

Professors Nanthi Bolan and Ravi Naidu of the Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment at the University of South Australia say Australia needs to avoid a legacy of toxic waste being left as a “time bomb” close to major population centres.

“When coal is burned to generate electricity it produces a number of combustion products which contain heavy metals and organic contaminants,” Bolan said.

“Traditionally these have been dumped in large piles or ash-ponds, mostly around the power stations themselves.

“These products can pose serious threats to air, water and soil and consequently to living organisms, including people.”

The researchers say this risk from old coal-fired power stations is similar to that from old oil refineries, gas works and service stations.

As cities grow, contaminated sites are surrounded by homes, workplaces and schools, exposing more citizens to the risk of legacy toxins from decades earlier.

Naidu said governments had to take steps to ensure this contamination was managed, contained, neutralised or removed.

“Over the coming 30 to 40 years many of Australia’s old coal-fired stations will close down, partly due to the carbon tax and partly as they are replaced with cleaner, more efficient forms of power generation,” he said.

“Today these are mostly on the urban fringe but that may not be the case as cities grow.

“Ensuring the contamination is properly dealt with and budgeted for should be a part of the decommissioning plan for all our brow coal and black coal power stations.”

Bolan said technologies existed that reduced the risk from old power stations.

These include things such as phytocapping or using vegetation to cover the dumps and prevent rainfall from leaching into water ways. Or there is the use of active barriers to intercept and cleanse polluted groundwater.

“We may also be able to convert coal ash into a safe soil improver,” Bolan said.

“However, there is much work still to be done to develop a suite of solutions for any situation.”

This is where some of the revenue from the carbon tax could come in.

The researchers say an example of a clean-up levy is one imposed by the State of California on owners of underground petroleum tanks.

There also is a fund to assist small businesses with unexpected and catastrophic expenses associated with the clean-up of leaking petroleum tanks as well as other petroleum pollution emergencies posing a threat to human health, safety and the environment.

TOPICS:

Expert-led Insights reports built on robust data, rigorous analysis and expert commentary covering mining Exploration, Future Fleets, Automation and Digitalisation, and ESG.

Expert-led Insights reports built on robust data, rigorous analysis and expert commentary covering mining Exploration, Future Fleets, Automation and Digitalisation, and ESG.

editions

ESG Index 2025: Benchmarking the Future of Sustainable Mining

The ESG Index provides an in-depth evaluation of the ESG performance of 60+ of the world’s largest mining companies. It assesses companies across 10 weighted indicators within 6 essential ESG pillars.

editions

Automation and Digitalisation Insights 2025

Discover how mining companies and investors are adopting, deploying and evaluating new technologies.

editions

Mining IQ Exploration Insights 2025

Gain exclusive insights into the world of exploration in a comprehensive review of the top trending technologies, intercepts, discoveries and more.

editions

Future Fleets Insights 2025

Mining IQ Future Fleets Insights 2025 looks at how companies are using alternative energy sources to cut greenhouse gas emmissions