INTERNATIONAL COAL NEWS

Land & Environment Court now threatens Wallarah 2

THE progress of Kores' Wallarah 2 longwall proposal on the New South Wales Central Coast may be s...

Lou Caruana

The controversial project, which was the subject of a public planning assessment commission meeting last Wednesday, could end up stymied in the courts despite receiving the required planning approvals.

Rio Tinto subsidiary Coal & Allied was this week thwarted in its attempt to extend its Mt Thorley Warkworth complex in the Hunter Valley in the Land & Environment Court over environmental concerns by local residents after undergoing an exhaustive planning approvals process.

The Darkinjung Local Aboriginal Land Council is demanding $300 million from Wallarah 2 for allowing development on a section of its land at Wyong.

Wallarah 2 has had ongoing discussions with Darkinjung for many years regarding compensation for accessing its land to build a rail spur to connect to the existing railway line in order to transport export coal to the Port of Newcastle, according to the project manager for Wallarah 2 coal project Kenny Barry.

He claims the company has offered Darkinjung a package, including cash compensation, support for a proposed Darkinjung training centre, apprenticeships for local Aborigines and tertiary scholarships over the life of the proposed mine.

“This is really about a commercial agreement,” Barry told ICN.

“We have been negotiating with them for some time. As far as we are concerned they need to be ‘fairly’ compensated.

“We would love to sort this matter out with them.

“It’s a totally different situation with the Rio case, which was more based around environmental issues.”

Barry said the company would dispute the claim made by the land council that under clause 49-3A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation Act of 2000 that NSW Aboriginal Lands Council would need to give the project a sign off before it was approved.

Kores first prepared a tender for the Wallarah mine in 1994 and was rejected by the previous state labour government bfore it was voted out under its Part 3A planning approvals process.

Kenny said that he was more confident of the approvals process introduced by the current state government because it was more “apolitical and transparent”

Barry told ICN that concerns about mine subsidence from local residents were addressed by the Mine Subsidence Board.

“The MSB does cop a bit of flack but they do a good job,” he said. “They know what they are doing.”

TOPICS:

Expert-led Insights reports built on robust data, rigorous analysis and expert commentary covering mining Exploration, Future Fleets, Automation and Digitalisation, and ESG.

Expert-led Insights reports built on robust data, rigorous analysis and expert commentary covering mining Exploration, Future Fleets, Automation and Digitalisation, and ESG.

editions

ESG Index 2025: Benchmarking the Future of Sustainable Mining

The ESG Index provides an in-depth evaluation of the ESG performance of 60+ of the world’s largest mining companies. It assesses companies across 10 weighted indicators within 6 essential ESG pillars.

editions

Automation and Digitalisation Insights 2025

Discover how mining companies and investors are adopting, deploying and evaluating new technologies.

editions

Mining IQ Exploration Insights 2025

Gain exclusive insights into the world of exploration in a comprehensive review of the top trending technologies, intercepts, discoveries and more.

editions

Future Fleets Insights 2025

Mining IQ Future Fleets Insights 2025 looks at how companies are using alternative energy sources to cut greenhouse gas emmissions