INTERNATIONAL COAL NEWS

LHD accident prompts call for safety programs

THE Queensland Mines Inspectorate has recommended that mines consider introducing behavioural saf...

Lou Caruana

This article is 15 years old. Images might not display.

The machine’s bucket was being used as a low-level working platform from which to break a line of auxiliary ventilation tubes.

With the fan still running, and with suction pressure still on the tubes, the worker attempted to split the tubes by removing the hanging chains and pulling on the sagging tubes.

When the worker eventually parted the tubes they moved unexpectedly, sending him sideways, causing him to fall from the bucket and hit his head on the floor.

The Incident Cause Analysis Method (ICAM) investigation identified the root cause as a failure to follow site procedures, as training documents for the LHD specifically prohibited working from the bucket.

A man basket that could have been used was available nearby.

Contributing factors relating to the task included a failure to identify the hazard of fan pressure acting on the tubes and the lack of a safe work procedure for splitting the tubes.

“Absent safety features, including poor footing, lack of edge protection and no emergency stop, combined with the potential for unexpected dynamic movement, makes the loader bucket an unsuitable mobile working platform,” the inspectorate said in its safety alert.

“Working from an LHD bucket presents an unacceptable level of

risk.”

There is clearly a need to follow agreed safe working procedures, and provide for effective supervision and people should not be transported or lifted on work platforms unless it is designed and fit for that purpose.

The bucket in this case, positioned less than 0.5 metres from the ground, clearly demonstrates that significant risk of fall injury exists even when working at low height.

The inspectorate recommends that:

  • Everyone at a mine should be fully aware of their obligations under mining safety and health legislation, including compliance with safety and health management system procedures;
  • Employers should assist by clearly communicating the ‘obligations of persons generally’ under mining safety and health legislation to their employees;
  • Mines should consider behavioural safety programs to reinforce the safety obligations and behavioural expectations held of persons at the mine;
  • Review availability and location of work platforms (man baskets) relative to work areas, to ensure there are sufficient available when needed;
  • Consider and review risk controls for tasks at the mine which may involve working at low height;
  • Review safe work procedures for tasks involving auxiliary ventilation systems, to ensure the hazard of potential energy from fan ventilating pressure is considered and appropriately controlled.

TOPICS:

Expert-led Insights reports built on robust data, rigorous analysis and expert commentary covering mining Exploration, Future Fleets, Automation and Digitalisation, and ESG.

Expert-led Insights reports built on robust data, rigorous analysis and expert commentary covering mining Exploration, Future Fleets, Automation and Digitalisation, and ESG.

editions

Future Fleets Insights 2026

Mining IQ Insights delivers annual standalone reports that expand upon the most relevant discussion points in the mining sector.

editions

ESG Index 2025: Benchmarking the Future of Sustainable Mining

The ESG Index provides an in-depth evaluation of the ESG performance of 60+ of the world’s largest mining companies. It assesses companies across 10 weighted indicators within 6 essential ESG pillars.

editions

Automation and Digitalisation Insights 2025

Discover how mining companies and investors are adopting, deploying and evaluating new technologies.

editions

Mining IQ Exploration Insights 2025

Gain exclusive insights into the world of exploration in a comprehensive review of the top trending technologies, intercepts, discoveries and more.