INTERNATIONAL COAL NEWS

Companies charged for sexist, racist policies

A PAIR of US coal companies in Illinois and Montana are being sued by the Equal Employment Opport...

Donna Schmidt

This article is 14 years old. Images might not display.

The sex discrimination suit, filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois in Benton, is against Illinois-based Mach Mining.

The move was made, the EEOC said, after it first attempted to reach a pre-litigation settlement through conciliation.

EEOC v. Mach Mining, formally known as Case 11-879-JPG/PMF, argues that the operator failed to hire any female miners since beginning operations in 2006, despite receiving applications from “many highly qualified women”

It also claims that no bathrooms or changing facilities for women miners were provided in the newly constructed facility.

Mach employs about 130 workers.

“Mach Mining needs to realize that this is 2011, not 1911,” EEOC Chicago district office supervisory trial attorney Gregory Gochanour said.

“While the number of women in the mining industry is still much lower than their numbers in the general population, women miners are out there, they were applying at Mach mines, and they had a right to be considered on their qualifications and merits.”

A second EEOC suit has been filed against Alliance Resource Partners subsidiary River View Coal in Union County, western Kentucky, claiming federal laws were violated by the company’s denial of employment to black applications.

“A class of qualified black applicants were denied jobs in underground mining positions at River View Coal’s mine [in Waverly] since at least August 2008 because of their race,” the suit states.

Case 4:11-cv-117 has been filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, Owensboro Division, also after the EEOC first attempted to reach a pre-litigation settlement.

The agency is seeking back pay as well as compensatory and punitive damages from River View Coal, which began producing coal in 2009.

It is also requesting other relief, including a permanent injunction to prevent the company from engaging in hiring discrimination in the future.

“Employers must choose employees based on their qualifications, and not on the color of their skin,” EEOC Indianapolis district office regional attorney Laurie Young said.

Neither Mach nor Alliance have issued a public statement on the pending litigation.

TOPICS:

Expert-led Insights reports built on robust data, rigorous analysis and expert commentary covering mining Exploration, Future Fleets, Automation and Digitalisation, and ESG.

Expert-led Insights reports built on robust data, rigorous analysis and expert commentary covering mining Exploration, Future Fleets, Automation and Digitalisation, and ESG.

editions

Automation and Digitalisation Insights 2025

Discover how mining companies and investors are adopting, deploying and evaluating new technologies.

editions

Mining IQ Exploration Insights 2025

Gain exclusive insights into the world of exploration in a comprehensive review of the top trending technologies, intercepts, discoveries and more.

editions

Future Fleets Insights 2025

Mining IQ Future Fleets Insights 2025 looks at how companies are using alternative energy sources to cut greenhouse gas emmissions

editions

Automation and Digitalisation Insights 2024

Exclusive research for Mining IQ Automation and Digitalisation Insights 2024 shows mining companies are embracing cutting-edge tech