INTERNATIONAL COAL NEWS

Glencore production limiting strategy to continue: Glasenberg

GLENCORE will continue to reduce production at is Australian coal mines even though they are cash...

Lou Caruana

This article is 10 years old. Images might not display.

The global commodities giant would keep reviewing operations that did not return adequate margins and return on investment, he told an analysts briefing.

“What is also important that we do decrease production at some of these assets, even if they are cash-positive,” he said. “These are not loss-making operations. They are not cash-negative. Some of them…our coal operations where we have cut production, these operations we saw as cash-positive.

“So we do have a belief. We just do not want to put more supply into a market where it is not required, and preserve the asset base and the production where we can get higher margins.”

Last week Glencore continued its strategy of reducing coal production during the low coal price environment by winding down output from its troubled Collinsville mine in Queensland, resulting in the likely loss of 180 jobs.

The company had started consultation with its Collinsville workforce over further steps to reduce production at the mine, explaining that lower coal prices and market oversupply have contributed to Collinsville incurring financial losses during 2015.

Most employees at the mine will take annual leave during the shut down for nearly three weeks over the Christmas period.

Glasenberg said the marketing adjusted EBIT guidance for the company has now moved between $US2.4 billion to $2.7 billion for 2016.

“The majority of these earnings, as we continue stating in the past and we continue to state for the future, is underpinned by logistics activities-services that are less sensitive to pricing, he said.

“And this has once again been improved by our 2015 marketing EBIT where it will be around $2.5 billion for 2015.

“The guidance for 2016 being $2.4 billion to $2.7 billion is below the usual guidance of $2.7 billion to $3.7 billion. And why we have dropped it below the $2.7 billion because, as you all know, we have dropped production at various of our assets.

“We've reduced working capital.”

Long-term, Glencore has no intention to reduce its anticipated $2.7 billion to $3.7 billion target.

“And we believe, as markets stabilize and we bring these production tonnes back and we are able to increase our working capital, then we will get back to those figures,” he said.

TOPICS:

Expert-led Insights reports built on robust data, rigorous analysis and expert commentary covering mining Exploration, Future Fleets, Automation and Digitalisation, and ESG.

Expert-led Insights reports built on robust data, rigorous analysis and expert commentary covering mining Exploration, Future Fleets, Automation and Digitalisation, and ESG.

editions

ESG Index 2025: Benchmarking the Future of Sustainable Mining

The ESG Index provides an in-depth evaluation of the ESG performance of 60+ of the world’s largest mining companies. It assesses companies across 10 weighted indicators within 6 essential ESG pillars.

editions

Automation and Digitalisation Insights 2025

Discover how mining companies and investors are adopting, deploying and evaluating new technologies.

editions

Mining IQ Exploration Insights 2025

Gain exclusive insights into the world of exploration in a comprehensive review of the top trending technologies, intercepts, discoveries and more.

editions

Future Fleets Insights 2025

Mining IQ Future Fleets Insights 2025 looks at how companies are using alternative energy sources to cut greenhouse gas emmissions